# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_M rz 1911_S129 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Kirchlich⸗Zeitgeschichtliches. 129 well also to state that there are thrée or four. and possibly even five dif- ferent kinds of 'gemeinschaftliche' churches. There is oneé of which we know, and there may be others, in which the Lutherans oπwn one traet and the Reformed another. the church being built upon the one and the school house upon the other. both oνπned and cçontrolled jointly. We know of a number of other instances reported as Cnion churches Whereé the one denomination owus the property and the other worships in the church on alternate Sundays, without anxy further rent than the payment of one-half of current expenses and needed rebairs. In a large number of instançces Lutherans and Reformed are joint oπners of the property which is man⸗ aged by trustées elécted by ethe two congregations. In other instances the Lutheran church couneil and the Reformed consistory jointly form a board kor the managing of the property. In many of these latter eases the pas- tors are not even named among the officers. The so-called independent churches, at least many of them, without saying anything about doctrine, or the faith. hold joint elections for officers and pastors, manage their affairs very much as if the two congregat ions were oné. But it is a matter of sincere satisfaction to know that the number of churches of this latter kind is not large. Someée even of those who have theoretically adopted this“ posit ion practically ignore it. Being a matter of many years' growth, it will require timeé to outgrow it.“ Es liegt aber auf der Hand, daß es bei solchen „gemeinschaftlichen“ Kirchen, auch in den besten Fällen, ohne allerlei Unionisterei nicht abgehen wird. F. B. Verbalinspiration. Der Lutheran (S. 34) teilt aus einer Rede, die Phillips Brooks 1886 vor theologischen Studenten hielt, folgende treffliche Stelle mit: The theory now s0o popular that the words of Sceripture are not inspired has béeen invented to account for the supposed errors in the Bible. If you come to anything that does not agrée with your ideas, vou fall to this theory to the dishonor of God's Word. Now, if the words may be disbelieved, yon see how réaddlily you can curry the iden à step further and disbelieve sentences or passages or whole sections.. .. It is a marvelous faet that those very passages that men are most apt to be⸗ lieve uninspired areé thée ones which have réceived the sanction of Jesus Christ Himself in the New Testament. He makes reference to Lot's wife, wWho was turned to a pillar of salt, to the destruction from heaven of Sodom and Gomorrah, to Jonah and the whale. It is nonsense to say: I believe Christ, but not tliose things.“ No man with a thimbleful of brains will do it.“ Auch dem Lutheran gereicht dies Zeugnis zur Ehre. Teilen aber auch D. Haas und D. Jacobs diese Stellung? F. B. Die Lehrstellung der Generalsynode betreffend schreibt der Lut erun Observer vom 13. Januar: The General Synod is as staunchly a Lutheran body as any in America. Its theology is not that of Trent or Geneva, but of Augsburg. It holds, rejoices in, and promulgates the distinctively Lutheran ecnception of the Gospel. But in recognizing the points in which it thus differs from other evangelical Protestant Churches, it does not korget the truths which it holds in common with them. Neither is it unmindful of the fact that these common truths are the great, essential, saving ones of the Gospel. Wnere it differs krom other churches in the theological interpretation and coordination of some of these truths, it greatly prefers its oπn. But it pereeives that the particularistie teach- 9